{"id":10763,"date":"2025-02-08T10:52:39","date_gmt":"2025-02-08T09:52:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/?p=10763"},"modified":"2025-04-04T19:37:10","modified_gmt":"2025-04-04T18:37:10","slug":"the-anniversary-of-the-markale-massacre-is-once-again-being-used-for-denial-and-shifting-blame","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/2025\/02\/08\/the-anniversary-of-the-markale-massacre-is-once-again-being-used-for-denial-and-shifting-blame\/","title":{"rendered":"The anniversary of the Markale massacre is once again being used for denial and shifting blame"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><em><a href=\"https:\/\/raskrinkavanje.ba\/analiza\/godisnjica-masakra-na-markalama-ponovo-povod-za-negiranje-i-prebacivanje-odgovornosti\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"\">Original article<\/a> (in Bosnian) was published on 06\/2\/2024; Author: Nerma \u0160ehovi\u0107<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p><em>The massacre at Sarajevo\u2019s Markale marketplace, in which 68 people were killed, is a documented war crime for which court verdicts have been issued. Despite this, the anniversary of the massacre in February this year was once again accompanied by media denial of the crime.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On February 5, 2025, the <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/oeSAl\">31st anniversary<\/a> of the massacre at the Markale market in Sarajevo was commemorated. In this massacre, a mortar shell explosion killed 68 people and wounded 140. As in previous years, the anniversary prompted some media outlets in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the region to publish articles denying the responsibility of the Army of Republika Srpska (VRS) for this massacre and claiming that it was staged.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The news agency Srna published two articles on this topic, one on February 4 and another on February 5.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><em>\u201c<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/fP3yB\"><em>MARKALE ONE\u201d &#8211; A CRIME ATTRIBUTED TO SERBS WITHOUT EVIDENCE<\/em><\/a><em> (Srna, February 4, 2025)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/9z5ur\"><em>\u201cMARKALE\u201d &#8211; A CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF A FALSE FLAG OPERATION<\/em><\/a><em> (Srna, February 5, 2025)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/fP3yB\">article<\/a> published on February 4 states the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><em>At the Markale market in Sarajevo, on February 5, 1994, due to an explosion allegedly caused by \u201ca single mortar shell\u201d, 68 people were killed, and the Serbs were accused in order to, as it later turned out, force the withdrawal of heavy weaponry around Sarajevo.<\/em><br><em>The Serbian side denied responsibility, claiming that the tragedy was staged by the Sarajevo government under the control of SDA leader Alija Izetbegovic.<\/em><br><em>At the time, UNPROFOR commander General Michael Rose stated that it could not be determined where the shell had been fired from.<\/em><br><em>(&#8230;)<\/em><br><em>No independent investigation was ever conducted into this attack, nor into the explosion that occurred almost in the same place at the end of August 1995, which served as justification for massive NATO airstrikes on Republika Srpska.<\/em><br><em>Former UN special envoy Yasushi Akashi stated in 2011 that it was \u201cunclear who committed the massacre at the Markale market in 1994\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/9z5ur\">article<\/a> from February 5 contains nearly identical claims, supplemented by statements from Professor Dragan Kolev, who asserts that the Markale massacre was a \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/4FODn\">false flag operation<\/a>\u201d, meaning an attack carried out in a way that blamed the enemy side. He describes the genocide in Srebrenica and the massacre in Racak in the same way. He claims that the \u201cstaged massacre\u201d was planned at the Pentagon and carried out by the Army of Bosnia and Herzegovina (ARBiH), which then blamed the VRS, to pressure the international community into demanding the withdrawal of VRS heavy weaponry from around Sarajevo.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><em>\u201cThere is ample evidence supporting the claim that everything was staged, but the other side finds it difficult to admit this because their entire narrative of a defensive war is based on the myth of &#8216;Markale&#8217;. The same story applies to Srebrenica. Muslims have written books about it themselves, but certain myths must be maintained to keep nations divided and filled with hatred, making them pawns for certain geopolitical interests\u201d, Kolev stated.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>The claims from these articles were republished by about a dozen other web portals in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the region. An <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/b0WGQ\">article<\/a> published on the web portal Nova Srpska Politicka Misao on February 5, 2025, states that after the massacre, \u201ca report sent to the UN headquarters suggested that the tragedy had been staged\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-large-font-size\"><strong>Legally established Facts about Markale<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Denying the Markale massacre is repeated annually in some media, and Raskrinkavanje has addressed this topic multiple times (<a href=\"https:\/\/raskrinkavanje.ba\/analiza\/odgovornost-za-masakr-na-markalama-nije-pripisana-vrs-u-bez-dokaza\">1<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/raskrinkavanje.ba\/analiza\/nova-teorija-zavjere-i-stari-negatorski-narativ-o-masakru-na-markalama\">2<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/raskrinkavanje.ba\/analiza\/mediji-i-njihovi-sagovornici-kontinuirano-negiraju-cinjenice-o-markalama\">3<\/a>). The phrase \u201cMarkale &#8211; a crime attributed to Serbs without evidence\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/xsDHY\">has been published before<\/a>, mainly by Srna.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is not true that responsibility for the Markale massacre was \u201cattributed\u201d to the VRS without evidence. For the crime committed on February 5, 1994, former President of Republika Srpska Radovan Karadzic and Commander of the Sarajevo-Romanija Corps (SRK) Stanislav Galic were both <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/Afh7E\">sentenced<\/a> to life imprisonment by final judgment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>An <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/Afh7E\">article<\/a> from the web portal Detektor on war crimes prosecution in Bosnia and Herzegovina, published in February 2023, explains that these verdicts were handed down by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague, based on facts established through investigations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><em>According to court rulings, the mortar shell was fired from SRK positions in Mrkovici. The Tribunal in The Hague was presented with evidence, SRK orders, and expert analyses, showing that the Seventh Battalion of the First Romanija Infantry Brigade of the SRK had 120mm mortars stationed in Mrkovici, located north-northeast of Markale.<\/em><br><em>In the final verdict against Galic, the ICTY confirmed that the 120mm mortar shell fired at the Markale market on February 5, 1994, was \u201cbeyond a reasonable doubt deliberately fired from SRK-controlled territory\u201d.<\/em><br><em>\u201cThe majority believes that the claim that the Bosnian Army forces would target, as would be the case here, their own civilians is not only unreasonable but also contradicts the established legally relevant facts\u201d, the same verdict states. Regarding the 1994 Markale massacre, it further states: \u201cThis incident represents an example of shelling where civilians were deliberately targeted\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>The ruling also details that in the trial against Galic, 171 witnesses were heard, and 1,268 pieces of evidence were presented, including 603 by the prosecution, 651 by the defense, and 14 by the Tribunal itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>An <a href=\"https:\/\/raskrinkavanje.ba\/analiza\/sputnik-teorije-zavjere-o-teoriji-zavjere\">analysis<\/a> conducted by Raskrinkavanje, published on January 19, 2018, explained the reasons behind Galic&#8217;s 2003 sentencing (<a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20230820221649\/https:\/\/www.icty.org\/x\/cases\/galic\/tjug\/bcs\/031205.pdf\">a ruling <\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20230820221658\/https:\/\/www.icty.org\/x\/cases\/galic\/acjug\/bcs\/gal-acjudg061130.pdf\">confirmed<\/a> in 2006).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><em>In determining the facts, the court examined the findings of a \u201clocal investigative team that arrived at the market at 1:20 p.m. on the day of the explosion\u201d and whose \u201cinvestigation lasted approximately a week\u201d. The trial chamber also reviewed \u201cseparate reports from expert members, including ballistics experts Mirza Sabljica, Hamdija Cavcic, and Berko Zecevic\u201d. Additionally, the court considered reports from \u201cUN military observers and members of Team 4 from the French UN battalion\u201d, as well as findings from another UN team that continued \u201cprevious (UN) investigations\u201d, focusing \u201con crater analysis and technical aspects of the explosion\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Thus, it is not true that this crime was \u201cattributed\u201d to the Army of Republika Srpska without any evidence or that an independent investigation was never conducted. The court proved beyond any doubt that the shell fired at Markale came from VRS positions and that it was a deliberate attack on civilians.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The article published by Srna misleadingly presents statements by former UNPROFOR commander Michael Rose and former UN Secretary-General\u2019s Special Envoy for the Balkans Yasushi Akashi, claiming that both stated it was impossible to determine where the shell was fired from.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>General Rose <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/BO9i0\">testified at Radovan Karadzic\u2019s trial in 2010<\/a>, stating that his position remained unchanged from 1994 to 2010, he believed the shell was fired from Serbian positions. He noted that the first report by French UNPROFOR forces suggested the shell was fired from Bosnian positions, but a second report from UN experts indicated it was more likely fired from VRS positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Akashi did <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/zpkKa\">state<\/a> in 2011 that the Markale massacre was a \u201cmurky case\u201d because the shell could have come \u201cfrom either warring side\u201d. However, as reported in an <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/L3KF7\">article<\/a> published by Detektor in 2012, he later clarified in an interview with Serbian media that \u201chis statement cannot change the facts established in The Hague Tribunal and will not influence ongoing legal processes\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Claims that other massacres from the 1990s (the 1995 Markale massacre and the 1999 Racak massacre in Kosovo) and the Srebrenica genocide were staged or falsely attributed to Serbian forces are also completely unfounded. The facts and responsibilities for these crimes have long been established and proven, as Raskrinkavanje has also reported (<a href=\"https:\/\/raskrinkavanje.ba\/analiza\/rasvjetljavanje-sta-su-cinjenice-o-genocidu-u-srebrenici\">1<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/raskrinkavanje.ba\/analiza\/teorija-zavjere-o-insceniranom-masakru-u-racku-ponovo-u-medijim\">2<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/raskrinkavanje.ba\/analiza\/odgovornost-za-masakr-na-markalama-nije-pripisana-vrs-u-bez-dokaza\">3<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Therefore, the claims that responsibility for the 1994 Markale massacre was \u201cattributed\u201d to the VRS without evidence and that an independent investigation was never conducted are assessed as the <strong>distribution of fake news<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The claim that \u201cthe report submitted to the UN suggested that the tragedy was staged\u201d, published on the web portal NSPM, is evaluated as a<strong> manipulation of facts<\/strong>, given that other reports and judicially established facts confirming that the VRS was responsible for the massacre were omitted.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Original article (in Bosnian) was published on 06\/2\/2024; Author: Nerma \u0160ehovi\u0107 The massacre at Sarajevo\u2019s Markale marketplace, in which 68 people were killed, is a documented war crime for which court verdicts have been issued. Despite this, the anniversary of the massacre in February this year was once again accompanied by media denial of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":10764,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[316],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10763","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-fact-checks"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10763","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10763"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10763\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10910,"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10763\/revisions\/10910"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10764"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10763"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10763"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10763"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}