{"id":6025,"date":"2022-11-09T18:06:39","date_gmt":"2022-11-09T17:06:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/?p=6025"},"modified":"2024-04-15T14:06:39","modified_gmt":"2024-04-15T13:06:39","slug":"see-check-supports-krik","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/2022\/11\/09\/see-check-supports-krik\/","title":{"rendered":"SEE Check supports KRIK and their fight against corruption and organized crime"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"c-bq-gray\"><strong>Engl.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/\">SEE Check<\/a> supports <a href=\"https:\/\/www.krik.rs\/\">KRIK<\/a> after an unprecedented attack on freedom of expression and professional journalism in which the newsroom was found guilty of reporting on publicly available information that the prosecution presented before the court.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Judge Natasa Petricevic Milisavljevic condemned KRIK for publishing quotes from recordings of wiretapped conversations of members of the criminal group that were released during the trial of the criminal Zoran Jotic Jotka. The lawsuit for defamation was filed by the former director of the Security and Information Agency and the current Minister of the Interior of Serbia, Bratislav Gasic, whom one of the defendants stated in the video that he was with Jotic &#8220;on the cauldron&#8221;, and that because of this, Jotic does not have to to worry about his safety.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It follows from the verdict that KRIK injured the honor and reputation of Bratislav Gasic by accurately and precisely reporting on the evidence presented by the prosecution, clarifying the meaning of the phrase &#8220;on the payroll&#8221;, by which the accused indicated that Gasic was receiving money from Jotic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Although KRIK received a financially symbolic sentence, the court&#8217;s message for journalism in Serbia is devastating: journalists will be punished if they do their job and report professionally on court processes against corruption and organized crime.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Therefore, this case testifies at the same time to the structural pressures on journalism, as well as to the shortcomings of the rule of law in Serbia, about which SEE Check members will continue to inform the domestic and international public.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"c-bq-gray\"><em><strong>BHSC<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em><a href=\"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/\">SEE Check<\/a> podr\u017eava <a href=\"https:\/\/www.krik.rs\/\">KRIK<\/a> nakon nezapam\u0107enog udara na slobodu izra\u017eavanja i profesionalno novinarstvo u kojem je jedna redakcija progla\u0161ena krivom zbog izvje\u0161tavanja o javno dostupnim informacijama koje je tu\u017eila\u0161tvo iznijelo tokom sudskog procesa.&nbsp;<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Sutkinja Nata\u0161a Petri\u010devi\u0107 Milisavljevi\u0107 osudila je KRIK zbog objavljivanja citata sa snimaka prislu\u0161kivanih razgovora \u010dlanova kriminalne grupe koji su pu\u0161teni tokom su\u0111enja kriminalcu Zoranu Joti\u0107u Jotki. Tu\u017ebu za povredu ugleda i \u010dasti podnio je biv\u0161i direktor Bezbednosno-informativne agencije i sada\u0161nji ministar unutra\u0161njih poslova Srbije Bratislav Ga\u0161i\u0107, za kojeg je jedan od optu\u017eenih na snimku izjavio da se nalazi kod Joti\u0107a \u201cna kazanu\u201d te da zbog toga Joti\u0107 ne mora da brine za svoju bezbjednost.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Iz presude proizlazi da je KRIK povrijedio \u010dast i ugled Bratislava Ga\u0161i\u0107a time \u0161to je naprosto ta\u010dno i precizno izvje\u0161tavao o dokazima koje je iznijelo tu\u017eila\u0161tvo, uz poja\u0161njenje zna\u010denja samog izraza \u201cna kazanu\u201d, kojim je optu\u017eeni na snimci poru\u010dio da Ga\u0161i\u0107 prima novac od Joti\u0107a.<\/em>&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Iako je KRIK-u propisana kazna koja je finansijski simboli\u010dna, za novinarstvo u Srbiji mnogo je poraznija poruka suda da \u0107e novinari\/ke biti ka\u017enjeni\/e ako rade svoj posao i profesionalno izvje\u0161tavaju o sudskim procesima protiv korupcije i organizovanog kriminala.&nbsp;<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Ovaj slu\u010daj, stoga, svjedo\u010di istovremeno o strukturnim pritiscima na novinarstvo, kao i o nedostacima vladavine prava u Srbiji, o \u010demu \u0107e \u010dlanice SEE Checka nastaviti informisati doma\u0107e i me\u0111unarodne javnosti.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Engl. SEE Check supports KRIK after an unprecedented attack on freedom of expression and professional journalism in which the newsroom was found guilty of reporting on publicly available information that the prosecution presented before the court. Judge Natasa Petricevic Milisavljevic condemned KRIK for publishing quotes from recordings of wiretapped conversations of members of the criminal [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6026,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[317],"tags":[37,29,35,10,77,28,34],"class_list":["post-6025","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-bosnia-and-herzegovina","tag-croatia","tag-montenegro","tag-politics","tag-see-check","tag-serbia","tag-slovenia"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6025","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6025"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6025\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6032,"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6025\/revisions\/6032"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6026"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6025"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6025"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seecheck.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6025"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}