No Supreme Court Ruling Against Covid-19 Vaccination in Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Case

Illustration, Faktoje

Original article (in Albanian) was published on 8/2/2024; Author: Pustina Patris

The claim that the Supreme Court of the United States ruled against Covid-19 vaccination in a case brought by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is false. Kennedy Jr. has confirmed that this misinformation circulating online since 2021 is inaccurate.

The article published on the sot.com.al portal on February 5th boldly asserts in its headline: “John F. Kennedy’s Nephew Exposes Covid-19 Vaccine Deception, Raising Concerns About Unknown Side Effects for Vaccinated Individuals, The U.S. Supreme Court has Confirmed Irreparable DNA Damage from Covid-19 Vaccines, Leading to Legal Challenges against Pharmaceutical Giants and High-ranking EU Officials.

The article on sot.com.al portal

The article claims that “U.S. justice has verified that Covid-19 vaccines are not vaccines” and that “the Supreme Court has confirmed irreversible DNA damage caused by genetic therapies from Covid.”

The article does not refer to any source or document that proves this claim.

A search on the official website of the United States Supreme Court does not indicate that the Court has reviewed or made any decisions on such a matter as described in the article.

while the article mentions ‘John F. Kennedy,’ it is likely referring to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who clarified in 2021 to the Associated Press that the claim he had presented this issue before the Supreme Court is misinformation. He stated that while he has been involved in various lawsuits concerning vaccine safety, none of them have reached the Supreme Court.

“The article about the Supreme Court is misinformation,” Kennedy said. “The quote is fabricated. Clearly somebody made it up and is promoting it because the same quote keeps coming back no matter how many times I deny it. The same article keeps reappearing.”

This statement highlights that this false claim has been circulating online since 2021 in different languages. It has also been debunked by international colleagues.